112112BrokersRESEARCH WITH CONTEXT
Independent broker
research & source records

← Back to Reviews

Den89Comment

Comment on AAFX Trading

★★★★★1 / 5Initial 1-star scoreReference #1555
<p>Yes, I heard about that story with the Hong Kong regulator, but I don’t really care about it. Further back, I created an account with AAFX Trading broker, and now I’ve already got some pleasant experience. The trading is fine, I’ve made already several withdrawals – so what’s the point if one of the regulators refused to recognize this broker? Many brokers just jump between regulators, but this doesn’t change a thing. What really matters is that the broker withdraws funds and the platform isn’t buggy. 🙂</p>

Replies 2

Mate NagyReply
★★★★★

<p>I also don’t think that this is very important how many regulators broker has and what kind of companies these are. Perhaps I’m an eternal optimist but I think that those times are already in the past, when a good broker can just rapidly become a scammer and betray its clients. Anyway, companies-shifters are left behind in the past 20 years ago.<br> From the other side, if the company was created with the purpose to cheat on clients, then none of the regulators will prevent it from doing so. When people commit such crimes, then the regulators’ rules are nothing for them. It’s good, that AAFX operates on the market for too long to worry about it. When the company works honestly for so many years, it is more important than all kind of licenses…</p>

Open reply #1556 →
Vicente AzevedoReply
★★★★★

<p>I agree. All these licenses, agreements and so on can be purchased or downloaded from somewhere. But it’s absolutely no guarantee that you and your money will be perfectly safe. Actually, a good broker is time-tested. And the aafx handled it perfectly, I know a lot of people who have been trading here for a long time and do not want to change their broker. I belong to this category myself, and I think that I was very lucky to be here among my like-minded people and work exactly as I want.</p>

Open reply #1557 →